The lazy teacher wins the race

We observe the specimen in its natural habitat. Homo procrastinatus. A lone secondary school teacher.

This teacher is, above all else, a creature of extraordinary vigilance. Do not be fooled by the stillness. Behind the eyes, a full threat scan is running continuously.

The inbox is checked first. An email arrived at 4:52pm. Subject line: "Quick question." There is no such thing as a quick question. The teacher files this under "tomorrow's problem" with the quiet efficiency of someone who has learned that opening it now achieves little more than a ruined evening.

Next: the cover list. The school-wide email that lands at 7:30am and is opened with the specific dread of a jury summons. The teacher scrolls. Their name is not on it. They exhale. Tomorrow is another jury summons.

They arrive at school several minutes early. Well. Several seconds. The corridor incident from yesterday requires a plan. A gang of giggling Year 8s materialised outside the classroom door at 12:03pm. Technically lunch. The student wore the expression of someone preparing to say "can we talk to you about something?" Six words that have never, in the entire recorded history of secondary education, preceded the enjoyment of a sandwich in peace.

And finally: the 2:20pm visit on a Friday, lesson 5. Staring down the barrel of a Year 10 class with the scent of the summer holidays ahead. The distant sound of very sensible shoes on a hard corridor floor. An SLT drop-in. Unannounced. Hence "drop-in." A smile that was technically present. "Thank you for inviting me into your lesson."

The teacher adjusted their posture. Opened a purposeful-looking tab. Made meaningful eye contact with the front row, and increased their step count round the room. Skilfully recalling "I do, we do, you do" and "pose, pause, pounce." This appears to have worked, this time.

Only now, at 4:48pm, does the pile come into view at home — which officially can be done in directed hours. Unofficially, the teacher cannot remember what directed hours means.

The avoidance rituals begin

First: the tea. Made with great ceremony. Never drunk. Left somewhere between the kettle and the table, cooling gently, like a small monument to good intentions.

Next: the desk reorganisation. Pens sorted by colour. Sticky notes restacked. A stapler that has not been used in living memory is moved eighteen centimetres to the left. Then back. This process takes eleven minutes and achieves nothing, but it feels like progress, which is close enough. "Perhaps the laundry needs doing. What about the kitchen cabinets." Various avoidance strategies run like a script.

Finally, with the reluctance of someone defusing a bomb, contact is made, red pen in hand.

Marking begins

"What went well: great use of key terminology." "What went well: really good use of key terminology." "What went well: excellent use of key terminology. You should be very proud."

These are, philosophically, the same sentence. The teacher knows this. The teacher does not care. They have written it seventeen times and will write it fifteen more. By assessment twenty-three, the handwriting has evolved into something that is technically a new language.

The "even better if" section fares no better. "Even better if you had included more detailed analysis." Applied to twenty students, this implies twenty students all made identical errors. They did not. The teacher knows this. The teacher is operating on fumes and the structural memory of what feedback is supposed to look like is evaporating fast.

A brief thought experiment

Elon Musk automates a rocket. Reusable. Lands itself. He gets the cover of Time magazine, three documentaries.

A teacher uses a rubber stamp that says "Marked and understood" instead of handwriting it for the forty-second consecutive time. They get a look from their line manager. The kind of look that says "is that really in line with our marking policy? That is a departmental decision — has that stamp got a stamp of approval?"

An engineer writes code that does their job automatically while they drink an oat milk latte and think about their next side project. They are called a genius.

A teacher finds a tool that marks 30 assessments in a PPA, reviews every mark, adjusts where needed, and returns feedback to students faster than any teacher in history. They are, apparently, cutting corners. Won't put in the work like everyone else. "5–8 hours of marking in your free time is part of the job — although you shouldn't mark in your free time because of #teacherwellbeing, however it's due on Monday." The teacher has been repeatedly told it is a calling. They are not convinced that is the Oxford dictionary definition.

What is actually happening

Let us be clear about what is actually happening.

The average secondary school teacher works 50+ hours a week. They did not agree to fifty hours. They agreed to a job they believed in. The surplus hours exist because the education system is only financially viable if teachers quietly absorb the excess as a personal contribution. The pile on the kitchen table is not evidence of laziness. It is evidence of a workforce subsidising an underfunded system with their evenings, their weekends, and a significant portion of their mental health.

1 in 3 teachers does not make five years. 9 in 10 cite workload as the reason they leave. 4 in 5 report experiencing mental health symptoms. These are not the statistics of a lazy profession. These are the statistics of a profession that has been running on goodwill so long that the goodwill is running out.

Teachers are not lazy. Schools also care a great deal. They are just operating in an impossible system to do more for teachers' wellbeing.

The actual answer is tools that work. We are Homo sapiens. Our species is defined by the ability to use tools. What were once flint and sticks snowballed into combustion engines and microprocessors. The teacher, however, is still equipped with a red biro, a passion for teaching, and an unholy tolerance for stress.

What a sensible teacher toolkit looks like

Here is what a sensible teacher toolkit looks like right now.

Worksheets and resources. Teachmate.ai generates differentiated classroom resources in seconds. The worksheet that used to take a Sunday afternoon can now be done before registration. It is not cheating. It is what every other profession would call a reasonable use of available technology.

Lesson planning and admin. Planning software such as MagicSchool, Eduaide and Oak National Academy's Aila (UK specific) produce first drafts of lesson plans, quizzes, homework and classroom resources.

Marking. A specialist tool like DeepMark takes piles of handwritten assessments and produces marked papers with hundreds of annotations and personalised feedback for every student in minutes. You review it. You adjust anything that needs adjusting. You confirm the marks, press print and go home. The marking is yours, and so is your weekend now. Aligned with all DfE guidance on AI in UK schools.

This is not laziness

Laziness is avoiding the work entirely and hoping nobody notices. This is doing the work better, faster, and with enough energy left over to actually remember why you went into teaching in the first place — and perhaps who you are outside of it too.

The pile will always exist. The question is whether it should have to win every single time.

The teacher closes the laptop. The pile, for once, is gone by 3:30pm. The tea is drunk while it is still warm.

The race, it turns out, goes not to the one who stayed latest and could hack it. But to the one who found a better system.

Toss the red pen in the bin. We dare you.

Try DeepMark →